Christina Crawford's Lies Do NOT Validate You

 Your Abuse Does NOT Validate Christina Crawford's Lies

     


     Many individual observers attempt to legitimatize Christina Crawford's lies about her mother, Joan Crawford, by using their own stories of "abuse." However, this is an enormously FLAWED logic. 

     Unless you lived in the SAME household, and was raised by the SAME mother, Joan Crawford, your personal stories are NOT relevant. Repeat: NOT RELEVANT.  One can NOT claim a negative (or even a positive) is true about a person based solely upon their personal experience with a totally different person who was NOT Joan Crawford. Unless you lived in the Joan Crawford household your "abuse" experience does not, in any way, give merit to Christina Crawford's lies.

     Theoretically, many people who attempt to legitimatize Christina Crawford's lies using this logic seem to do so simply because they consciously, or unconsciously, feel their own "abuse" experiences are validated by Christina Crawford's lies. Some legitimate abuse survivors may feel the NEED to believe Christina Crawford's lies because it validates their experiences. They may mentally and emotionally insert themselves into any story of "abuse," (regardless of how improbable) and thereby blur the lines in their mind of what is their personal experiences in life and what is Christina Crawford's lies. 
     In this instance, observers who do this will become preternaturally acceptable to believe any claim of abuse, regardless of its merit, because they are mentally and emotionally inserting themselves, and their emotions, into a separate situation of which they have no personal experience. Through this means it then becomes their story. This is a FALSE logic.
     In certain instances, some abuse survivors may feel their experience makes them "special." It does not. Abuse is a tragic occurrence in the world, however, experiencing abuse does not make a person special from the rest of society. Those who think of themselves in this mindset are even more acceptable to inserting themselves into any claim of abuse because there is an even deeper motive for personal validation through their abuse experience.

     It is important to remember that Christina Crawford's lies do NOT validate your life. It does NOT give you power. It does NOT give you justice. Christina Crawford's lies is NOT your experience. 

     In actuality, Christina Crawford's lies are making a mockery of your abuse and of legitimate abuse survivors. 
Christina Crawford is NOT a survivor, she is a liar. If you are an abuse survivor, Christina Crawford's lies are actually making you a victim, not a victor, by preying upon your emotions.

     Below are examples of people who have, unfortunately, most probably, used the logic explained above. 












Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Joan Crawford's Daughter WINS Lawsuit Against Sister

Image
  JOAN CRAWFORD'S DAUGHTER WINS SUIT AGAINST SISTER ELLIOT GROSSMAN, The Morning Call THE MORNING CALL November 25th, 1999 Two daughters of legendary actress Joan Crawford continue to have a strained relationship, but their local court dispute appears to be over. Cathy LaLonde of Allentown, Crawford's adopted twin daughter, has been awarded $5,000 plus court costs for public statements Christina Crawford wrongfully made about her. LaLonde and Christina Crawford were among four children adopted by Joan Crawford. The others were Cynthia, the other twin, and Christopher. Christina Crawford told interviewers last year that LaLonde was not a twin, just a girl who looks like Cynthia. She made the statements while promoting a new edition of " Mommie Dearest ," her best-selling 1978 book about her Academy Award-winning mother. A panel of three arbitrators issued the decision Nov. 4 after a one-hour hearing in Philadelphia, lawyers for both sides said this week. Neither side p...
Read more

Christina Crawford Lied (Proof)

Image
  Excerpt from Christina Crawford’s “ Survivor ” (1988): “ In the dead of that winter, David and I had to return to New York for my deposition in the will contest and to meet with my editor regarding the third and last section of the manuscript.   The deposition was one of the most grueling and nerve-wracking experiences I’d ever had.  We started at eight-thirty in the morning and finished about four in the afternoon with an hour for lunch. I dreaded going back for day two. I felt that everything possible was being done to humiliate me and force such discomfort that I would consider dropping the lawsuit. I knew I was telling the truth… ”   Excerpt from Christina’s February 9 th , 1978 court-ordered, under-oath, deposition: Attorney: “ Did you ever have a fight with your mother, the result of which she sent you back to Chadwick School for the period of the summer? ” Christina Crawford: “ I can only say that it’s possible. I don’t remember the absolute spe...
Read more